What is plagiarism in journalism? Benchmarks as guidance for editorial offices
By Klaus Meier | The term and the meaning of »plagiarism« have recently been transferred from academia into journalism without further thought. This is highly problematic and dangerous given that, although different standards and benchmarks apply for the two professions, merely a public accusation of plagiarism has the potential to destroy reputations and careers. This essay hopes to contribute to a nuanced debate and thus help to prevent scandalization of the issue of plagiarism in journalism. What benchmarks can be used as a guide – both during research and writing and when accusations arise after publication? What is common and reasonable journalistic practice, and what is a »no go?«