Counter-narratives for »self-thinkers« An attempt to classify right-wing conservative »alternative media«

By Luis Paulitsch | »Alternative media« have gained in importance for the far right in the digital space, while recent years have also seen a rise in similar platforms at the right-wing, conservative end of the spectrum. Although media projects like this represent alternative positions, their relationship with the criticized »mainstream« is much more ambivalent. This essay highlights various unique features that can be used to distinguish right-wing conservative media from other »alternative media.« The publications Tichys Einblick, eXXpress and NIUS are used as examples.

The press and Gaza Restrictions, censorship and the hazards of war reporting

By William Lafi Youmans | During wars, states’ militaries are strategic communicators seeking to manage public perception, yet in times of war they also have greater command over press access, making them something like referees. In war time, the preexisting legal protections given to the work of news media are often relaxed in the name of emergency exceptionalism and as jurisdictional gray areas arise in theaters of conflict. Israel has moved further in limiting media access in times of escalated conflict, most recently the war on Gaza that started following the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israeli military bases and communities around the enclosed strip. This essay overviews Israel’s press policies, military censorship regime and the response of western news organizations, as well as the repression of Palestinian reporters and Al Jazeera. It further asks whether Israeli’s press controls have any impact on news reporting.

The war in Gaza, German media and the »wrong side of history«?

Mandy Tröger in conversation with Kai Hafez | The German Communication Association (DGPuK) recently published a »position paper for non-discriminatory discourse.« It was prompted by reactions to a statement issued by academics at Berlin universities defending the right of students to protest against the war in Gaza. The DGPuK condemns any hostility towards academics, defamation and threats – both from outside and within the academic community. This position paper shows again the great need for academic expertise and discourse regarding the war in Gaza, reporting on this war and the conflict in the Middle East. Kai Hafez, Professor of Comparative Analysis of Media Systems and Communication Cultures at the University of Erfurt, Germany, is a recognized expert on questions of media representations of the Middle East in German media. In the last few months, he has been expressing his criticism on current war reporting, for example, on German national radio Deutschlandfunk, in the press and in media podcasts.

The top 10 of book journalism Recommendations for books by journalists

By Fritz Hausjell and Wolfgang R. Langenbucher | A project by the University of Vienna’s Department of Communication, the idea of selecting and presenting the best German books by journalists was co-founded by Hannes Haas (1957-2014) and is compiled by Wolfgang R. Langenbucher and Fritz Hausjell. The first edition was published in 2002 in the quarterly journal Message, founded by Michael Haller. When that journal ceased publication, the book recommendations were documented in the magazine Der österreichische Journalist [The Austrian journalist] from 2015. This was interrupted in 2020 and 2021 due to the pandemic. In 2022, a new place of publicationwas found: Journalism Research.

Sylvia Dietl (2022): Transformation und Neustrukturierung des DDR-Rundfunks im Prozess der Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands [The transformation and restructuring of GDR broadcasting in the process of German reunification]

Reviewed and translated by Mandy Tröger | Rarely are there dissertations that make a central contribution to a better understanding of historic reality. Sylvia Dietl’s book is such a dissertation; it rewrites an entire chapter of German media history. This is no small achievement. An indication of the book’s strength are its 658 pages and over 1700 footnotes. But the book’s power lies in its content: Dietl analyzes the transformation and restructuring of East Germany’s broadcasting system more than 30 years ago. The political scientist does this on the basis of a broad range of sources, with analytical ingenuity and a love for detail. In ten chapters, she shows how the unification of the Western Federal Republic of Germany (FGR) and the Eastern German Democratic Republic (GDR) came along with »a complete transfer of institutions from West to East Germany«.

Daniel Siemens (2022): Hinter der Weltbühne. Hermann Budzislawski und das 20. Jahrhundert. [Behind the World Stage. Hermann Budzislawski and the 20th century]

Reviewed and translated by Stine Eckert | He wasn’t a champion of women, says Daniel Siemens in an Online-Talk orga­nized by the Critical Communication Studies Network on March 15, 2022, about Hermann Budzislawski, whose biography he wrote. It is the first one about the man »behind the world stage« – a pun referring to Budzislawski’s years as editor-in-chief of the famous and influential German Weltbühne magazine, meaning literally World Stage, during the Weimar Republic. Again and again, Siemens addresses Budzislawski’s difficult interactions with women authors. For instance, when he shrugged off the article offered by 29-year old Hannah Arendt about the Jewish World Congress, perhaps because she signaled she also could take her work to the competition, the Tage-Buch magazine. Or when he denied that Dorothy Thompson, one of the most important American journalists at the time, had achieved her fame through her own work and charisma. But first things first.

Stine Eckert, Ingrid Bachmann (eds.) (2021): Reflections on Feminist Communication and Media Scholarship

Reviewed by Claudia Wilhelm | Edited by Stine Eckert and Ingrid Bachmann, this volume brings together ten essays by big names in feminist communication and media research. All ten authors have won the Teresa Award for the Advancement of Feminist Scholarship, awarded by the Feminist Scholarship Division (FSD) of the International Communication Association (ICA). The Teresa Award honors work that makes an important contribution to the development, reach and influence of feminist research in communication and media studies. It is intended to increase the visibility of gender-related research among an expert audience. The essays trace the lines of development of feminist research within media and communication research.

Reaching for reconciliation Reader responses to seven newspapers’ apologies for histories of racist coverage

By Anna E. Lindner, Michael Fuhlhage, Keena Shante Neal, and Kirby Phillips | In the wake of the 2020 »racial reckoning,« many institutions issued apologies for complicity in systemic racism – and the news industry was no exception. This paper surveys the apologies issued by one news publication, the Montgomery Advertiser, that apologized two years before the 2020 reckoning, and six other newspapers that issued apologies between 2020 and the present day: the Los Angeles Times; Kansas City Star; Baltimore Sun; Philadelphia Inquirer; Seattle Times; and Oregonian. The present study investigates these publications’ apologies for racist and other problematic coverage through the lens of the Christian principles of sacramental reconciliation, which are designed to address past wrongs and repair relationships between transgressors and those who have been harmed. In addition, this paper assesses public responses to each of the new organizations’ expositions of and apologies for racist coverage, focusing on opinions published in public forums, particularly by people of color who belong to communities that have been harmed by these publications; journalists of color; editors and others involved in news making processes; and other prominent thought leaders in issues of race. Examining the wide range of responses to such apologies provides insight into public opinion about news institutions’ current standing with racialized communities and possible future steps toward more equitable and fair coverage of those who have historically been mistreated by news organizations.

How journalism advances surveillant technology through weightless criticism Understanding one way consumers are nudged toward a state of total surveillance

By Robert W. McMahon | The growth of consumer products with surveillant capabilities, in conjunction with the economic pressure journalism is under, has created fertile ground for surveillance capitalism to thrive and journalism to become complicit in that growth. An examination of a corpus of texts containing the products of journalism suggests this complicity can be seen through a style of reporting conceptualized as weightless criticism.